Tailwind left the stack in 2.0.0, but the package still carried about 330
mentions of it. What the guard's Tailwind detection protected — a class
that compiles to nothing — is now protected by a check that does not care
where a dead class came from.
DesignGuard: about 500 lines of Tailwind tables, scales, palettes and
"2.0.0 replacement" hints give way to one check — a class a view or PHP
file writes that neither the application's stylesheets nor the package's
own declare. It catches a utility of any framework, a typo and a class
whose rules were deleted alike, so it also found two classes ReStride
draws nothing with. A stylesheet has to be in reach for it: the `.css`
files among the scanned paths, or what the `missingStylesheets()` entry
imports. The class reader no longer mistakes an array index for a class
list (`$block['base']`), and it reads the array a class helper is given,
where it read nothing before.
The package's own three Tailwind self-guards go with it. Only their one
unique check stays, as a test of its own: every `matchMedia` width in
resources/js is an M3 breakpoint.
The pagination views are `material.blade.php` and
`simple-material.blade.php`; only Laravel's and Livewire's default theme
names ever made them `tailwind`. The provider sets `Paginator`'s default
views and switches `livewire.pagination_theme` to `material` when it is
still Livewire's own default, so no application can forget the config; a
theme an application chose, and a component's own `$paginationTheme` or
`paginationView()`, still win.
The rest is prose: the layer-order guidance for an application that still
builds Tailwind, the Tailwind wording in the README, the Boost guidelines
and the development skill, and about 25 "this used to be a Tailwind
utility" comments, along with every "plan step NN" pointer into a
gitignored folder. The reset keeps its credit, and NOTICE now carries it
too.
Feature suite 1159 passed, Chrome browser suite 299 passed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Plan step 41 review: an application's CSS entry may import what a Vite
build resolves but Stylesheets::bundle() refuses (tailwindcss mid-
migration, a font URL, a layer() import); resolvedFiles() threw on each,
failing the application's whole design test. It now follows relative
imports only and skips the rest. Each missing stylesheet, shadowed tag
and ->links() is reported once, at its first use, instead of at every
occurrence; a CSS entry that does not exist says so; the @import line goes
through vendor/ when Composer symlinks the package.
missingStylesheets() also switched on the literal-value check for the
entry's whole import graph, vendor stylesheets included, with no way to
check imports alone. Check (iii) now reads the .css files scan() is given,
like every other check; the entry's imports still feed the class
exemptions, now escaped selectors (.hover\:underline) included.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qwx5USif3wFFmxtHg5U1g9
